<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-12-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5165" />
  <endPage num="5207" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Conflict of Interest</name>
      <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000144">
        <heading>Conflict of Interest</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-12-02">
            <name>Conflict of Interest</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-12-02T14:38:33" />
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000145">
          <timeStamp time="2021-12-02T14:38:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:38):</by>  These were actually cabinet decisions and the Treasurer is a member of cabinet.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000146">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Was that a question to the Treasurer?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000147">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  No, it was a point of order as to why this supplementary was in order, because these are actually cabinet decisions. The cabinet decides, the cabinet must take a note of why the decisions were made on any of these conflicts of interest. It's the Ministerial Code of Conduct, indeed under the charge of the Premier, but administered by the cabinet, and the Treasurer is a member of the cabinet and so he should know whether or not he was asked why—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000148">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The member will resume her seat.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000149">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —the 'woke bloke' from Black—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000150">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The member has made her point.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000151">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —thought that oil—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000152">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The member will resume her seat!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000153">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  —was a bridge too far but coal was not.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021120233f17e27da394c8490000154">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The member will resume her seat! It is not a matter as to what the member refers to. It is a matter as to whether the supplementary related to the original answer, and in my view it didn't, and we are now going to move on to the Hon. Mr Wortley.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>