<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-10-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4639" />
  <endPage num="4728" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Enterprise Agreement</name>
      <page num="4642" />
      <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000076">
        <heading>Public Sector Enterprise Agreement</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-10-27">
            <name>Public Sector Enterprise Agreement</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-10-27T14:26:47" />
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000077">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-27T14:26:47" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (14:26):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Can the Treasurer outline the progress toward setting the enterprise agreement with representatives of the salaried members of the state's public sector?</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000078">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000079">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! The Treasurer has the call and will be heard in silence.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000080">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000081">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! Leader and the Hon. Ms Bourke! The Treasurer has the call.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000082">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. Wortley interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000083">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  And the Hon. Mr Wortley!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2021-10-27T14:27:15" />
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000084">
          <timeStamp time="2021-10-27T14:27:15" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:27):</by>  It is a very important issue for our hardworking members of the public sector, and I thank the honourable member for his question. The salaried members of the public sector are the largest single component of the state's public sector, some 30,000 to 35,000 employees covered by this particular enterprise agreement.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000085">I am pleased to be able to report to the chamber that the key union that represents the salaried members of the public sector, noting that there are a number of other unions that do represent components of the total membership, the key negotiating force, the key representative, is the PSA, the Public Service Association, and they have conveyed to me that they are recommending the government's offer to their members, which will go to a ballot in the first two weeks of November. We hope to have a result from that particular ballot in and around the middle of November.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000086">Without going into all of the detail, the PSA successfully negotiated retention of significant components of what is known as the RRR, the redeployment process, albeit they have agreed to a concession in relation to a removal of the pre-declaration of an employee being excess process, which will shorten the process in relation to the identification of excess employees. It nevertheless remains a significant impediment to any government in terms of ongoing implementation of the policy first announced by the former Labor government some seven or eight years ago.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000087">The government has conceded in relation to that, but the government offer, which the PSA are now recommending acceptance of, is 1.5 per cent salary increases, with a $1,000 up-front payment in recognition of the fact that there has not been a pay increase for almost two years because of the accommodation of the delays in the negotiation of the enterprise agreement and, obviously, COVID and COVID-related factors as well.</text>
        <text id="202110273f6295eda8914b5780000088">So we welcome the fact that the PSA are recommending it. There is, for example, the HSU, which is a smaller union in terms of total representation; it is still agitating for a 3 per cent increase. That is at twice the level that the PSA are recommending acceptance of. The government, whilst acknowledging that, recognises the PSA has been the major negotiator on behalf of the salaried members of the public sector and that virtually all of the settlements between the government on behalf of taxpayers and unions over the last year or so have settled in and around the range of 1.2 per cent up to 2 per cent. So any salary increase of 3 per cent or higher was clearly not possible for the taxpayers of South Australia to be able to afford.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>