<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4371" />
  <endPage num="4420" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Conflict of Interest</name>
      <text id="20210923c8d47e0fe03f40a890000037">
        <heading>Conflict of Interest</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-09-23">
            <name>Conflict of Interest</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-09-23T14:20:17" />
        <text id="20210923c8d47e0fe03f40a890000038">
          <timeStamp time="2021-09-23T14:20:17" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:20):</by>  My question is to the minister for the public sector. As the Leader of the Government in this place, can you assure the council that no government member will vote on changes to ICAC legislation, if it returns to this council, if such a member is currently the subject of an investigation or referral by an integrity agency and who may have a perceived or actual conflict of interest in relation to integrity laws?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-09-23">
            <name>Conflict of Interest</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-09-23T14:20:46" />
        <text id="20210923c8d47e0fe03f40a890000039">
          <timeStamp time="2021-09-23T14:20:46" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:20):</by>  I addressed this issue publicly this morning and yesterday afternoon, that is, in the debate yesterday or last evening I think it was. There was no vote in the Legislative Council such was the unanimity of views shared by all members in this particular chamber. So the inference from some that the views of one member or two members in a particular chamber are immaterial when there are no votes. There was a unanimity of views and no-one disagreed with the package of amendments that was moved yesterday.</text>
        <text id="20210923c8d47e0fe03f40a890000040">The second point I make is that, of course, I have no knowledge of what the ICAC is or isn't looking at. I have no idea whether there are members of the Labor Party or the crossbench or indeed, in many other cases, even the government backbench, other than those that might have already been made public. So I'm not in a position, nor is anybody, to give guarantees as to whether the ICAC is or isn't looking at the affairs of a particular member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>