<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-06-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3711" />
  <endPage num="3747" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20210609b12995fc5b6c44ff80000054">
        <heading>SkyCity Adelaide</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-09">
            <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-09T14:33:34" />
        <text id="20210609b12995fc5b6c44ff80000055">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-09T14:33:34" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:33):</by>  I thank you for the flippant response. Are you confident or can you perhaps come back to the chamber, through the Attorney-General, to at least tell the chamber whether or not the politically exposed persons are government ministers or public sector employees in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-09">
            <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-09T14:33:59" />
        <text id="20210609b12995fc5b6c44ff80000056">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-09T14:33:59" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:33):</by>  I can indicate that I haven't been money laundering through the Casino. I don't have sufficient money, I suspect, to be money laundering. I can't add anything further to the comprehensive response I have given to the further question, and that is, as I said, I suspect the answer from AUSTRAC and from the Attorney-General will be that they are not in a position to indicate at this stage, whilst they are still conducting investigations, that we are looking at Mr X or Ms X, or whatever it might happen to be, and to publicly identify them at this particular stage, and that AUSTRAC is happy to share that information with the Hon. Mr Pangallo, as interested as he might be in their identity.</text>
        <text id="20210609b12995fc5b6c44ff80000057">Indeed, all of us would be interested to know the identity of people who might ultimately be charged with offences, and one would imagine that will become part of the public record. But in terms of any investigation, there will be an investigation of people who might ultimately be charged with offences and it is then up to them to prove their innocence or have their guilt proven, or there may well be people investigated who are completely innocent and there should be no requirement, in that case, to have their particular details publicly exposed by AUSTRAC, unless for whatever reason AUSTRAC decide they want to go down that path.</text>
        <text id="20210609b12995fc5b6c44ff80000058">We have no control over AUSTRAC. It is ultimately a decision for them, as an independent, national regulatory authority with the power to do what they are required to do. We are quite happy to wait for them to conclude their investigations and, if there are people to be charged, to charge those people at the appropriate time.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>