<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-06-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3663" />
  <endPage num="3709" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
      <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000344">
        <heading>SkyCity Adelaide</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-06-08">
            <name>SkyCity Adelaide</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-06-08T15:10:17" />
        <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000345">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-08T15:10:17" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:10):</by>  A politically exposed person is one who has been entrusted with a prominent public—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000346">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  I need a question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000347">
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  Yes, it is. In relation to the response from the Treasurer about a politically exposed person, who is someone entrusted with a prominent public function, will the Treasurer, or the Attorney-General, now have discussions with ICAC?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2021-06-08T15:10:42" />
        <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000348">
          <timeStamp time="2021-06-08T15:10:42" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:10):</by>  The honourable member has his version of what that particular phrase means. That is of interest but whether that's the view of AUSTRAC and others who are more intimately involved in this process I guess is the more important issue. The honourable member is aware of issues in relation to ICAC and the acts that govern that and I am sure that he is aware of the quite strict provisions that relate to public discussion about those issues. I'm sure he is mindful of that.</text>
        <text id="20210608db3ee12118a448aba0000349">Certainly, I can't add anything further to the fact that the responsible officer in this case, the Commissioner for Consumer and Business Services, has had discussions with AUSTRAC, so I am advised, and has put on hold their review of the current operations pending AUSTRAC completing their investigations. As I said earlier, it is their view—and I think everyone would accept that AUSTRAC is the appropriate body under the legislation to look at allegations of money laundering and related issues, and they also have the expertise and responsibility for undertaking any such investigation of allegations.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>