<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-05-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3617" />
  <endPage num="3661" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Bills</name>
    <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000609">
      <heading>Bills</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax (Discretionary Trusts) Amendment Bill</name>
      <bills>
        <bill id="s4847">
          <name>Land Tax (Discretionary Trusts) Amendment Bill</name>
        </bill>
      </bills>
      <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000610">
        <heading>Land Tax (Discretionary Trusts) Amendment Bill</heading>
      </text>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Committee Stage</name>
        <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000611">
          <heading>Committee Stage</heading>
        </text>
        <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000612">In committee (resumed on motion).</text>
        <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000613">Clause 3.</text>
        <talker role="member" id="605">
          <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000614">
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I thank honourable members. Parliamentary counsel has now drafted a compromise position, which I will move at the appropriate time, when you call me, Mr Chairman, to do so. </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000615">Can I just briefly explain, without having to revisit—in the interests of hopefully getting us all home at a reasonable hour tonight—the debate has essentially been that the government's preferred position was giving this flexibility for 12 months, which was going to be June 2022. The Labor Party's amendment was to give it for three months, which was September of this year. The Hon. Mr Pangallo came up with a sensible suggestion, which we are now moving, which is a compromise, which is six months, which is 31 December. </text>
          <page num="3657" />
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000616">So the amendment has been circulated in my name, and when we come to move that particular amendment it will be simply to provide the compromise position of a six-month option as opposed to either the 12 months, which the government wanted, or the three months. We think it is a sensible compromise, and I think everyone understands the position. To do so we would need to either defeat the Hon. Mr Maher's amendment or have him withdraw the amendment and then vote for the compromise position, which is the six-month amendment.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="5419">
          <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000617">
            <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  Thank you to the Treasurer for the compromise position. We will support it, of course, and my honourable colleagues will give their position on it. As I indicated, this whole thing has been a dog's breakfast. We certainly do not want to inflict any more unnecessary pain on taxpayers. I again thank the Treasurer for giving me assurances in relation to payment plans that taxpayers will undoubtedly be asking for when they start to get their bills, and I hope that the commissioner, when she views and assesses these repayment plans, shows some leniency and accords these taxpayers some generous terms for the repayments at zero interest and also with no penalties.</text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000618">I hope she does not just say, 'I'll give you three months.' I hope she is far more generous than that, and I hope that is the intent of the comments that were made by the Treasurer today, that the repayment terms will be generous, because I am assured by many, from people within the industry—accountants and tax lawyers—that there will be significant tax bills that will need to be met. With that, I await the next stage of the debate.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="6802">
          <name>The Hon. R.A. SIMMS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000619">
            <by role="member" id="6802">The Hon. R.A. SIMMS:</by>  On behalf of the Greens, I rise to speak in favour of this compromise. We had been supportive of the Labor amendment of three months, but this six months seems like an okay outcome. Everybody will leave slightly unhappy, and sometimes that is not always a bad thing. If you can reach a compromise, then we are open to doing that. In this circumstance, it sounds like something that is going to be workable for all parties. In that spirit, we are happy to support this.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="3404">
          <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000620">
            <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY:</by>  For the record, I indicate that I will be supporting the compromise position.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="4697">
          <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000621">
            <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Unsurprisingly, we prefer our position but, reading what people have said, I will not be proceeding and formally seek to withdraw our amendment, although I do not know what the procedure is. We will be supporting the position others have put. I make it clear and put on the record that we prefer three months, but having heard the contributions we recognise that is not possible.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker role="member" id="605">
          <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000622">
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  I move:</text>
          <text continued="true" id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000623">
            <inserted>Amendment No. 1 [Treasurer-1]—</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000624">
            <inserted>Clause 3, page 2, line 11 and 12 [clause 3(1)]—Delete subclause (1) and insert:</inserted>
          </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000625">
            <item sublevel="2">
              <inserted>(1)&amp;#x9;Section 13A(1)—delete '30 June 2021' and substitute:</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000626">
            <item sublevel="4">
              <inserted>31 December 2021</inserted>
            </item>
          </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000627">Amendment carried.</text>
        </talker>
        <talker kind="speech" role="office">
          <name>The Chair</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000628">
            <by role="office">The CHAIR:</by>  Clause 3 being a money clause, no question will be put on the clause.</text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000629">Schedule and title passed.</text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000630">Bill reported with amendment.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
      <subproceeding>
        <name>Third Reading</name>
        <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000631">
          <heading>Third Reading</heading>
        </text>
        <talker role="member" id="605" kind="speech">
          <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
          <house>Legislative Council</house>
          <startTime time="2021-05-27T17:37:20" />
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000632">
            <timeStamp time="2021-05-27T17:37:20" />
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (17:37):</by>  I move: </text>
          <text id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000633">
            <inserted>That this bill be now read a third time.</inserted>
          </text>
          <text continued="true" id="202105279a62c5ef01124f9b80000634">Bill read a third time and passed.</text>
        </talker>
      </subproceeding>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>