<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-05-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3617" />
  <endPage num="3661" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Voluntary Assisted Dying, Conscientious Objection</name>
      <text id="20210527dfe409e0468c43aa80000334">
        <heading>Voluntary Assisted Dying, Conscientious Objection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-05-27">
            <name>Voluntary Assisted Dying, Conscientious Objection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-05-27T15:30:32" />
        <text id="20210527dfe409e0468c43aa80000335">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-27T15:30:32" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:30):</by>  Why didn't the minister make that clear when there were amendments in the Legislative Council that that was going to happen?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210527dfe409e0468c43aa80000336">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  That didn't relate to the original answer.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-05-27T15:30:43" />
        <text id="20210527dfe409e0468c43aa80000337">
          <timeStamp time="2021-05-27T15:30:43" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:30):</by>  I honestly think it's not a good use of question time to have individual members engage on their stance on conscientious objection. I will certainly go back and read the <term>Hansard</term> in relation to the debate but I seem to remember that yet again I was persuaded by the logic of the Hon. Rob Lucas, which is that the issue of institutional conscientious objection was something that could be properly considered between the houses, and my understanding is that that's exactly what has happened.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>