<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-03-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3065" />
  <endPage num="3151" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Asbestos Diseases Society</name>
      <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000213">
        <heading>Asbestos Diseases Society</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-31">
            <name>Asbestos Diseases Society</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-31T15:05:56" />
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000214">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-31T15:05:56" />
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD (15:05):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer.</text>
        <page num="3076" />
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000215">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000216">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order! The Hon. Mr Hood has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3126" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000217">
          <by role="member" id="3126">The Hon. D.G.E. HOOD:</by>  Thank you, Mr President. My question is to the Treasurer. Will the Treasurer update the house on the recent decision to reduce funding to the Asbestos Diseases Society?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2021-03-31T15:06:26" />
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000218">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-31T15:06:26" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:06):</by>  I thank the member for the question, because it's an important issue that has been ventilated in the public arena as of Monday, I think, of this week in terms of some radio interviews. During the radio interview, the Labor member for Wright, Mr Boyer, made a number of statements which do bear correcting. The background to this, as Hon. Mr Hood has indicated, is ReturnToWorkSA made a decision—I will outline their explanation for the decision that they took—to reduce their level of funding from $45,000 a year to $20,000 a year next year and further again in the following year.</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000219">As a result of that decision being publicly ventilated, the member for Wright said, and I quote from a radio interview:</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000220">
          <inserted>And I think it really speaks to the priorities of the government that they would seek to make a budget saving—which is what this is, let's make no mistake, this is a budget saving—from a community group like Asbestos Diseases Society.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000221">He goes on further to say:</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000222">
          <inserted>…I think the instruction here would have come from above…</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000223">And then he goes on to say, 'Rob Lucas and the Marshall Liberal Government'. So endeavouring to finger poor old me as the Treasurer as the initiator of the decision as the result of a budget saving.</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000224">Can I make it clear that ReturnToWorkSA has advised me—and I knew it to be true because it certainly wasn't my decision—that this was a decision that had been taken by ReturnToWorkSA. They advised me that they had been funding the society for 10 years and had provided the total funding of $391,500. When they signed the most recent funding agreement, a two-year funding agreement, for $90,000 over two financial years, they included in the contract a specific clause which went, and I quote: that 'funding may not continue beyond this agreement'.</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000225">Consistent with that clause within their funding agreement, the ReturnToWorkSA management and/or board—I am not sure at what level the decision was taken—took the decision within their relatively modest overall sponsorship budget, which was $115,000. Previously, 40 per cent of their total sponsorship budget had been going to the Asbestos Diseases Society. They took the decision to reduce the allocation of their total sponsorship budget from about 40 per cent to just under 20 per cent of the total sponsorship budget going to the Asbestos Diseases Society.</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000226">ReturnToWorkSA have advised me that they also sponsor another organisation, which many members would know—the Asbestos Victims Association—which does some wonderful work. They say that since 2012, ReturnToWorkSA has funded that particular organisation to the tune of $7,000 per year since 2012. So I do want to reject completely the attempt to blame both the government and me as Treasurer as having directed ReturnToWorkSA to make this decision to make a budget saving in relation to the funding that they provide to the Asbestos Diseases Society.</text>
        <text id="2021033169a7bfcd242e49dbb0000227">ReturnToWorkSA, as they point out in their public statements on this issue, are an employer-funded organisation through levies, in terms of running the workers' compensation scheme. The scheme is admittedly under some funding pressure at the moment, but these are decisions that the board and/or management take in relation to how they expend their money. There was certainly no direction from me or from the government in relation to any funding allocation to the Asbestos Diseases Society.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>