<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-03-31" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3065" />
  <endPage num="3151" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Alberton Oval</name>
      <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000073">
        <heading>Alberton Oval</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-31">
            <name>Alberton Oval</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-31T14:35:42" />
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000074">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-31T14:35:42" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (14:35):</by>  Thank you; it was worth waiting for. Mr President, I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Treasurer, representing the Minister for Planning and Local Government, about the proposed redevelopment of Alberton Oval.</text>
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000075">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000076">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  Plans for a $20 million upgrade of Port Adelaide Football Club's home ground in Alberton have left many local residents angry that this public parkland, with old trees and community green space, is being traded for a new private soccer pitch and basketball gymnasium. While Port Adelaide Enfield council has already voted unanimously to support the development, many residents are angry that only those living within 60 metres of the proposed redevelopment are allowed to make submissions.</text>
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000077">Whilst the development is within the Port Adelaide Enfield council area, most of the residents affected by the development live in the adjoining Charles Sturt council area, and they are unhappy at not being included in decision-making. Port Adelaide Football Club has indicated that they want 90 junior teams to play there after hours each week, in addition to an unknown number of soccer teams. The local community is worried about local impacts, including an increase in traffic, and they note that only 12 additional parking spaces are proposed. They are nervous about seeing parking congestion and, ultimately, parking restrictions in the residential areas. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000078">1.&amp;#x9;Does the government agree that limiting consultation to only immediate neighbours is appropriate for such a large development that is alienating public land enjoyed by the whole community?</text>
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000079">2.&amp;#x9;What will the minister do to ensure that residents do not lose access to public green spaces?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2021-03-31T14:37:26" />
        <page num="3069" />
        <text id="202103313148f8e2ca104c56a0000080">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-31T14:37:26" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:37):</by>  It's very dangerous to ask me a question about anything to do with the Port Adelaide Football Club, so I shall suppress my innermost feelings in relation to that particular institution and I will dutifully indicate I will take the question up with the minister and, if the member is still around, make sure that a letter is sent to him to provide that response.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>