<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-03-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2841" />
  <endPage num="2866" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Housing Safety Authority</name>
      <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000052">
        <heading>Housing Safety Authority</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-03-04">
            <name>Housing Safety Authority</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-03-04T14:24:37" />
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000053">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-04T14:24:37" />
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (14:24):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Human Services regarding housing improvement.</text>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000054">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000055">
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE:</by>  On 17 February, the minister's agency issued housing improvements requiring a meth-contaminated house be cleaned by 17 August. On Friday 26 February, the landlord issued a form 2B to the tenant of the meth-contaminated house. This required them to provide vacant possession by Monday 1 March. Vacant possession is effectively an eviction order that requires all their possessions to be removed or risk them being seized by the landlord as abandoned goods and possibly sold off.</text>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000056">When experts from Flinders University recently attended the meth-contaminated home, they only entered after covering themselves in hazardous material suits. On radio this week, the tenant advised that it may cost $12,000 to $15,000 to have their possessions removed from the home and decontaminated. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000057">1.&amp;#x9;How can a retiree couple possibly find and pay for specialist contractors in hazmat suits in a single weekend to remove all their possessions that are contaminated by meth?</text>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000058">2.&amp;#x9;If the landlord now seizes their possessions as abandoned goods, what obligation does the landlord have to notify potential purchasers that their goods are contaminated?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-03-04T14:26:13" />
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000059">
          <timeStamp time="2021-03-04T14:26:13" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:26):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. The matters as relating to the Housing Improvement Act are indeed matters that are under my responsibility. My office has been providing advice to this couple about what their particular options are, but some of these matters fall into the responsibilities particularly through the Attorney-General with her responsibility for the Residential Tenancies Act and may actually require SACAT orders, which again the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal falls within the responsibility of the Attorney-General's Department.</text>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000060">My office has been assisting this couple. They have also, I understand, had advice through the RentRight service, which is run by Uniting Communities in conjunction with Service to Youth, and we continue to provide advice and support on what avenues they have.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202103046e5a83c8b6354dc290000061">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Ms Bourke, a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>