<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-02-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2584" />
  <endPage num="2618" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Personal Mobility Devices</name>
      <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000155">
        <heading>Personal Mobility Devices</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-02-04">
            <name>Personal Mobility Devices</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-02-04T14:42:31" />
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000156">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-04T14:42:31" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (14:42):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Treasurer, representing the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, about personal mobility devices.</text>
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000157">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000158">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  Every day that I come into the city, I can be sure to see a range of electric personal mobility devices (PMDs). These include electric scooters and electric skateboards. Most are being ridden on footpaths and shared-use paths, such as the Mike Turtur Bikeway, which is the route that I cycle into parliament most days.</text>
        <page num="2592" />
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000159">On 12 May last year, I asked a question about any government plans to regulate the use of privately owned e-scooters. These are different from the commercial e-scooters that are available for hire for short trips under trials currently underway in Adelaide and along the coastal path. By way of an answer, on 30 June last year, the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure advised that the National Transport Commission was conducting a review into the use of personal mobility devices, generally, and that this would inform the government's plans for PMDs. I understand that draft legislation is intended to be delivered to transport ministers by the National Transport Commission by May this year to legalise the use of PMDs on public infrastructure.</text>
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000160">In the nine months since I last asked about this, the rise in popularity of privately owned scooters has continued unabated. For example, Scooter Hut on Marion Road has a range of almost 30 models of e-scooters that can be bought, not to mention the hoverboards and other personal devices. I also note that in other jurisdictions private electric scooter usage has been successfully regulated. These include New Zealand, Canada, Germany, France, South Korea and Austria. In South Australia they remain illegal, with the government website pointing out all the fines that riders will be subjected to if they use a private rather than a commercial electric scooter. My questions of the minister are:</text>
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000161">1.&amp;#x9;Will the proposed legislative reforms in South Australia include the legalisation of privately owned PMDs, such as e-scooters, or will it be limited to commercial devices?</text>
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000162">2.&amp;#x9;If not, how does the government propose to manage the hundreds if not thousands of these privately owned devices already in use in South Australia?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2021-02-04T14:44:52" />
        <text id="20210204a0f8e6324c7248bcb0000163">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-04T14:44:52" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:44):</by>  I will take the member's question on notice and bring back a reply.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>