<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-02-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2478" />
  <endPage num="2527" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Rail Staff Incentive Offers</name>
      <text id="20210202f347da2af930498080000391">
        <heading>Rail Staff Incentive Offers</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3404" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. J.A. DARLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-02-02">
            <name>Rail Staff Incentive Offers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-02-02T15:54:25" />
        <text id="20210202f347da2af930498080000392">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-02T15:54:25" />
          <by role="member" id="3404">The Hon. J.A. DARLEY (15:54):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer, representing the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport, regarding rail staff offers. Can the minister advise what redeployment opportunities will be offered to the train drivers who did not accept an offer of employment with private provider Keolis Downer? Can the minister also advise whether targeted separation packages will be offered to staff and, if so, can the minister provide broad details of such offers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-02-02">
            <name>Rail Staff Incentive Offers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-02-02T15:54:57" />
        <text id="20210202f347da2af930498080000393">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-02T15:54:57" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:54):</by>  I am happy to respond; I can provide some detail in relation to that. Voluntary separation packages will be made available in certain circumstances, and the broad provisions of those are the same as they have been for a number of years. I think the details of those are publicly available on the Treasury website, I suspect, but I am happy to provide detail of the usual offers in relation to targeted separation packages. Generally, they relate to years of service, with a capped maximum amount, if someone is deemed to be eligible, that is, their job has disappeared.</text>
        <text id="20210202f347da2af930498080000394">In relation to job offers, the redeployment policy we inherited from the former government requires that—and I think the phrase is—a suitable job offer be made available to someone who needs to be redeployed, that is, their position has disappeared. The government is required and will comply with the terms of that particular policy and that is that suitable job offers will need to be made available to employees.</text>
        <text id="20210202f347da2af930498080000395">They will obviously vary, depending on the skill sets the individuals might have, or whether or not they are prepared or interested enough to retrain for potentially something else that they might not currently be suited to but with some retraining might become capable of performing that particular task. They are the broad parameters. I am happy to take on notice and provide any further detail to the member that I am able to obtain.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>