<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2021-02-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2478" />
  <endPage num="2527" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</name>
      <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000338">
        <heading>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2021-02-02">
            <name>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2021-02-02T15:40:47" />
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000339">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-02T15:40:47" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (15:40):</by>  In regard to the announcement of the winning tender, all South Australian companies providing the current service, including the government's own SA Ambulance Service, missed out, and instead the two large interstate companies won the contract, so jobs and money are leaving the state again. Why has the minister allowed yet another service to be outsourced to interstate companies rather than supporting local jobs?</text>
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000340">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000341">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! The Hon. Ms Scriven knows that the supplementary question should not have any explanation. </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2021-02-02T15:41:25" />
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000342">
          <timeStamp time="2021-02-02T15:41:25" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (15:41):</by>  I responded to this particular question on radio as well, but I am happy to repeat it in the council. The way that the tender was structured in terms of what we were looking for was that there was a range of things that were under consideration, including service provision, communications, the organisation's capacity to deliver, experience with the customer group and the ability to supply a range of devices for customers to choose from.</text>
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000343">Feedback was sought from the existing service providers, so clearly they were invited to tender. Indeed, there was a 15 per cent rating in favour of South Australian companies. Ultimately, at the end of the day, it's about the service provision for people with lived experience. We also had, from what I understand, an older person who had been referred to that tender evaluation panel from COTA SA who participated in that. We would have liked South Australian companies to have been successful, obviously, but we did need to, consistent with procurement guidelines, utilise the points system and so the ones that were chosen were the organisations that came out with the highest points.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20210202bf9e51a0f140423aa0000344">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Supplementary, the Hon. Ms Scriven.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>