<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2264" />
  <endPage num="2313" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Great State Voucher Scheme</name>
      <text id="2020120170a7398930804814a0000233">
        <heading>Great State Voucher Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-12-01">
            <name>Great State Voucher Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-12-01T15:12:07" />
        <text id="2020120170a7398930804814a0000234">
          <timeStamp time="2020-12-01T15:12:07" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:12):</by>  I thank the minister for the answer. In relation to those people who do take vouchers and then realise that it's not going to work for them, has any consideration been given to them being able to hand them back, as it were, so the government could reallocate them to people who might have just missed out? In other words, if the government kept a waiting list of people who weren't successful in the first 90 minutes—I think that was the experience last time—could there be a subsequent allocation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-12-01">
            <name>Great State Voucher Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-12-01T15:12:41" />
        <text id="2020120170a7398930804814a0000235">
          <timeStamp time="2020-12-01T15:12:41" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:12):</by>  I am happy to take that on notice. The commitment I have given as Treasurer is that if there's any unexpended portion from the first round we will do it for the second round. The member is raising the question of can we, within the second round, reallocate? I will take that on notice to see whether there is some mechanism where that's possible, but I am prepared to give the commitment again, as Treasurer, that if there is any unexpended portion from the third round we are not looking to retrieve that back into the budget.</text>
        <text id="2020120170a7398930804814a0000236">I am quite happy to give an assurance that there will be further funding in relation to whether they want to tweak that round within the round, extend it or indeed spend it in some way in terms of promoting the tourism sector. It will be money that stays within the tourism budget broadly.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>