<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-11-12" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="2151" />
  <endPage num="2218" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Rents</name>
      <text id="20201112c6877c2f8fb84940a0000556">
        <heading>Government Rents</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-12">
            <name>Government Rents</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-12T15:18:08" />
        <text id="20201112c6877c2f8fb84940a0000557">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-12T15:18:08" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:18):</by>  Thank you for the response, Treasurer. Will you issue directives to freeze these increases until the economic circumstances improve?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-11-12">
            <name>Government Rents</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-11-12T15:18:21" />
        <text id="20201112c6877c2f8fb84940a0000558">
          <timeStamp time="2020-11-12T15:18:21" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:18):</by>  No, I won't be issuing edicts. I am prepared to consider sensibly any reasonable request. As I said, the government, as the honourable member was kind enough to acknowledge, has been very generous with taxpayers' money in the first six months, but there will be some tenants who, as a result of the easing of restrictions, are going gangbusters or are unimpacted in terms of their retail operations.</text>
        <text id="20201112c6877c2f8fb84940a0000559">So I am not going to be issuing, or the government won't be issuing, system wide edicts in relation to what might be a resumption of normal activities. If a particular business is still doing as well or even better than pre-COVID, then there is no earthly reason why whatever the usual arrangements are shouldn't be resumed.</text>
        <text id="20201112c6877c2f8fb84940a0000560">If, in the circumstances the honourable member has outlined, someone is still massively impacted—they are still perhaps on JobKeeper or extended JobKeeper because their business is impacted—then the government has demonstrated in the past a willingness to consider their circumstances generously, and we are at least prepared to consider, without knowing the circumstances, the case the honourable member has outlined.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>