Legislative Council Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2) 54 2 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Question Time Coronavirus, Travel Coronavirus, Travel The Hon. T.A. FRANKS Legislative Council Coronavirus, Travel The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:40): A supplementary: is any appeal of a determination that is then appealed to the exemptions committee made of a subjective or objective nature? The Hon. I.K. Hunter Legislative Council The Hon. I.K. Hunter: He won't have a clue. The President Legislative Council The PRESIDENT: The minister has the call. The Hon. S.G. WADE Legislative Council Minister for Health and Wellbeing The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:40): Sorry, could you clarify what you are asking? The Hon. T.A. FRANKS Legislative Council The Hon. T.A. FRANKS: Where are the published requirements for an objection to a determination for an exemption made? Are they subjective or objective? The Hon. S.G. WADE Legislative Council The Hon. S.G. WADE: The point made— The Hon. K.J. Maher interjecting: The President Legislative Council The PRESIDENT: The honourable Leader of the Opposition will allow the minister to at least open his mouth and start to answer the question. Members interjecting: The President Legislative Council The PRESIDENT: Order! The minister has the call and will be heard in silence. The Hon. S.G. WADE Legislative Council The Hon. S.G. WADE: As Mr Hunter highlighted in his review, approvals in relation to essential travellers under the direction—in this case direction No. 13 or edition No. 13 of the cross-border direction—is against specific criteria, and SA Health has, if you like, custody of three of those criteria. In relation to exemptions from the direction itself, it is broad, and therefore there is much greater latitude in relation to exemptions from the direction.