<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1727" />
  <endPage num="1789" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Screening Checks</name>
      <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000108">
        <heading>Screening Checks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-23">
            <name>Screening Checks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-23T14:34:15" />
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000109">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-23T14:34:15" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:34):</by>  Given that the support worker of Annie Smith was not screened until after Annie Smith's death, can the minister be sure there are not people currently working with vulnerable people who do not have a screening? Apart from the case of the support worker of Ms Annie Smith, how many people have been prosecuted for not having a screening?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-23">
            <name>Screening Checks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-23T14:34:44" />
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000110">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-23T14:34:44" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:34):</by>  I thank the honourable member for her question. I think it bears repeating that of course the support worker who has now been charged with the manslaughter of Ann Marie Smith didn't have a screening for many, many years, which went back some time. That was something that was not picked up under the previous government. The obligation rests on the organisations—</text>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000111">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000112">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Order, on both sides!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000113">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  There are penalties for organisations not to have their workers screened—</text>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000114">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000115">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000116">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  —and those penalties are very serious.</text>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000117">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. Maher interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000118">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The honourable Leader of the Opposition is not helping the situation.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000119">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  Chuck him out.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000120">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  And neither are members on my right. The minister has the call.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000121">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  Of course, in some public commentary that I have seen, screenings have also been conflated with almost like a test of whether somebody is a fit and proper person. What they tell employers and the like is whether somebody has a criminal history. They are not an endorsement that somebody is the best support worker in the world. It doesn't tell you whether they have criminal intent; it is not able to predict those sorts of things. It doesn't tell you whether they are appropriately qualified of not. What it tells the screening unit, whether somebody has a screening or not, is whether they have a criminal history which has been picked up through the various criminal databases.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923fd634f2652474dcbb0000122">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Final supplementary on this one, the Hon. Ms Scriven.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>