<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-09-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1727" />
  <endPage num="1789" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Screening Checks</name>
      <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000098">
        <heading>Screening Checks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-23">
            <name>Screening Checks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-09-23T14:32:29" />
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000099">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-23T14:32:29" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:32):</by>  I appreciate the supplementary, Mr President, given the minister hasn't answered my first question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000100">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  It is just a question only.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000101">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  Yes, thank you. What is the minister doing to deal with the 100,000 people who her chief executive says may need a screening but don't have one? If her answer is nothing, based on her previous answer, can she guarantee there are not people working with children, or with other vulnerable people, who have not been screened?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-09-23T14:32:56" />
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000102">
          <timeStamp time="2020-09-23T14:32:56" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:32):</by>  There are a range of ways in which organisations are reminded of their obligations to ensure that if they are required by law to have a valid screening, those take place. Certainly, with any of our contracted partners those are often through agreements.</text>
        <page num="1731" />
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000103">There are a range of organisations in South Australia which, of course, are not regulated by us, and this is something I have had to try to explain in relation to disability services, which are now funded and regulated by the commonwealth government. They have their own systems in place. It has always been the case since screening has existed in South Australia that the organisations that are responsible for ensuring that people are screened are the organisations themselves. There are new obligations on individuals regarding working with children checks.</text>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000104">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000105">
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK:</by>  I think what the Labor Party is suggesting is that we need to knock on the door of every person in South Australia, audit their activities, and then determine whether they need a screening check. It is just absurd, Mr President.</text>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000106">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20200923e5d4dcaa08464aa0b0000107">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT</by>:  Order! A further supplementary, deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>