<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-09-08" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1519" />
  <endPage num="1561" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Vaccination Breaches</name>
      <text id="20200908e771282e17874786a0000768">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Vaccination Breaches</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-08">
            <name>Vaccination Breaches</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20200908e771282e17874786a0000769">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="5419">the Hon. F. PANGALLO </by>(1 July 2020).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-09-08">
            <name>Vaccination Breaches</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20200908e771282e17874786a0000770">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing):</by>  The Minister for Police, Emergency Services and Correctional Services has advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <page num="1560" />
        <text id="20200908e771282e17874786a0000771">
          <inserted>The Commissioner of Police is aware a nurse was nominated as a suspect on two occasions in 2014 and 2017. However<term>,</term> due to insufficient evidence both matters were not further investigated.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20200908e771282e17874786a0000772">
          <inserted>The Commissioner of Police notes that the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency investigation and subsequent South Australian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal hearing on 15 April 2020 would have been conducted using the balance of probabilities burden of proof threshold.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>