<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1433" />
  <endPage num="1517" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Safeguarding and Worker Screening</name>
      <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000465">
        <heading>Safeguarding and Worker Screening</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-23">
            <name>Safeguarding and Worker Screening</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-23T14:28:35" />
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000466">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-23T14:28:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Human Services regarding safeguarding and worker screening.</text>
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000467">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000468">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  Even before the minister received the interim report of the disability task force, written advice was provided to the minister that:</text>
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000469">
          <inserted>There are clear gaps in the information exchange with the Quality Safeguards Commission that must be addressed urgently.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000470">The written advice to the minister went on to outline four options that the state government may advocate for, all of which involved the NDIA and the commonwealth taking action, but to do nothing for the state government.</text>
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000471">My questions to the minister are: exactly what does the minister understand by the terms 'clear gaps in the information exchange' and 'must be addressed urgently', and how is it possible, minister, that your agency can only suggest potential things to ask others to do and not take concrete action themselves?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-07-23T14:29:34" />
        <text id="2020072398422715d8f0413390000472">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-23T14:29:34" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:29):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I'm assuming that what he is referring to is that the Quality and Safeguards Commission receives complaints about quality, potential abuse and those matters, and that the concerns that they receive when they are working through those processes, the collecting of evidence, if they have formed concerns about particular workers they would inform the DHS screening unit. The line of questioning in his first set of questions goes to those matters and, as he well knows, that is something that the state of South Australia has been advocating with the Quality and Safeguards Commission and which I'm pleased has reached a resolution.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>