<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-07-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1277" />
  <endPage num="1331" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Disability Services</name>
      <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000138">
        <heading>Disability Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-21">
            <name>Disability Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-21T14:40:51" />
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000139">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-21T14:40:51" />
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE (14:40):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Human Services regarding disability services.</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000140">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5413" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. E.S. BOURKE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000141">
          <by role="member" id="5413">The Hon. E.S. BOURKE:</by>  On 4 June this year, the minister was asked a question with the following explanation:</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000142">
          <inserted>When asked about disability careworker screenings in one particular media interview, the minister said all of the following, in this order: 'I can't comment on those sorts of details', 'I can't comment', 'I don’t have that information', 'That's a rather inappropriate question', 'I'm not going to talk about screening' and 'I'm not going to respond to this line of questioning'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202007212189375d3721477690000143">The minister was then asked how many applications had been received from Integrity Care following the death of Ann Marie Smith. The minister's answer did not reveal how many applications had been received and, instead, referred to ongoing investigations, including the federal inquiry by Alan Robertson SC. This week, when Alan Robertson SC came to Adelaide to undertake his inquiry, it was reported that, and I quote:</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000144">
          <inserted>Mr Robertson said 'neither Integrity Care SA Ltd…nor her carer Ms Maione have agreed to assist my review'.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202007212189375d3721477690000145">My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000146">1.&amp;#x9;Given that that the minister won't answer questions about Integrity Care and Integrity Care won't cooperate with the independent federal inquiry, how can the public have confidence that the truth will be revealed?</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000147">2&amp;#x9;Has the reporting of the dozens of screening applications from Integrity Care prejudiced any investigations?</text>
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000148">3.&amp;#x9;If not, why has the minister been hiding such critical information from the chair of her own task force?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-07-21T14:42:33" />
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000149">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-21T14:42:33" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:42):</by>  There are a lot of issues to unpack there. If I can respond to the last one first, in relation to the task force chair—I can just repeat, and I do get a bit tired of repeating myself but I feel that I have to because of the line of questioning—the task force is not looking into the details relating to the tragic death of Ann Marie Smith or the elements which necessarily include the disability services provider that was 'caring' for her at the time.</text>
        <page num="1283" />
        <text id="202007212189375d3721477690000150">Those comments that I made at the time I stand by and if one is to question confidence in the system in terms of the investigations, I think that is really a very unfortunate slur on the good work of the South Australian police force who have been working with my department. My department has also been working with the Quality and Safeguards Commission. I think the Labor Party knows that in relation to these matters, because they are under investigation, I am not able to provide specific details on them and that continues to be my position.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>