<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-07-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1239" />
  <endPage num="1276" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</name>
      <text id="20200702fb8e3ebf8c24424280000046">
        <heading>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-02">
            <name>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-02T14:30:10" />
        <text id="20200702fb8e3ebf8c24424280000047">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-02T14:30:10" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:30):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health and Wellbeing regarding the tender awarded to Sturdie Trade Services for CCTV cameras in aged-care facilities. Minister, in one of your replies yesterday you said that the Sturdie proposal was, and I quote, 'the best proposal put forward'. Why then is the trial only going to involve two sites and not the original five sites that were mentioned in the press announcement made by you and the Premier in April last year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-02">
            <name>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-02T14:30:59" />
        <text id="20200702fb8e3ebf8c24424280000048">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-02T14:30:59" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:30):</by>  The trial was initially planned to start across five sites; however, responses to the tender have led to the project initially focusing on the two pilot sites. Sturdie, as I said, was one of a number of tender bids. Obviously, they all put their own estimate of cost, and the evaluation panel identified Sturdie's bid as the best bid. I am confident that these two sites will help us to unpack the issues and fulfil the mission of the pilot.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>