<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-07-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1187" />
  <endPage num="1238" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</name>
      <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000189">
        <heading>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-07-01">
            <name>Aged-Care CCTV Trial</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-07-01T14:58:34" />
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000190">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-01T14:58:34" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:58):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing regarding CCTV cameras.</text>
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000191">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000192">
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  In a letter to the minister last year, Care Protect founder and CEO, Philip Scott, outlined his concerns to the minister about why he chose to withdraw his company from the pilot program. He warned:</text>
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000193">
          <inserted>We both know that some officers at SA [Health] are materially conflicted and I would repeat again, it was that reality and their ever-changing specification to create a scenario that we couldn't accept, which resulted in a withdrawal.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000194">He goes on:</text>
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000195">
          <inserted>Our due diligence evidenced commercial interests for Bret Morris and Chad Koury that completely fly in the face of being non conflicted. For them to be determining the specification and procurement process is by any standards, inappropriate. However, that is for you to resolve. In closing, I can accept the project won't involve us but I won't accept a tissue of lies about our business to attempt to cover up what is an [SA Health] probity issue.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000196">My question to the minister is: in light of this letter and questions I have asked you previously in this place on the same topic, are you still confident SA Health is not conflicted as warned by Mr Scott?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-07-01T15:00:17" />
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000197">
          <timeStamp time="2020-07-01T15:00:17" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:00):</by>  If the honourable member is asking me about whether SA Health is conflicted in relation to the current process, I can assure you that this procurement process was overseen by an independent probity adviser and I understand that independent probity adviser has raised no issues in terms of conflicts of interest.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202007017a072784f0a3410ea0000198">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Mr Pangallo with a supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>