<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1143" />
  <endPage num="1186" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>HomeBuilder Program</name>
      <text id="202006301d4df7ee853f4738b0000315">
        <heading>HomeBuilder Program</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>HomeBuilder Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T15:27:19" />
        <text id="202006301d4df7ee853f4738b0000316">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T15:27:19" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:27):</by>  Has the government sought an extension from the three-month period to six months, as the industry is requesting?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>HomeBuilder Program</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T15:27:31" />
        <text id="202006301d4df7ee853f4738b0000317">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T15:27:31" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:27):</by>  The answer to the question is we have sought to extend the three-month period. The federal government has indicated that it was prepared to concede some ground, which I have acknowledged previously either in this chamber or publicly and which we were grateful to see. They have said that in unforeseen circumstances or unforeseen events, the state department, which has to manage this, can extend the three-month period, but it has to be within the criterion that the commonwealth lays down, which is that it has to be an unforeseen event.</text>
        <page num="1160" />
        <text id="202006301d4df7ee853f4738b0000318">There have been arguments in relation to potential planning delays. There have been arguments in relation to potential housing construction delays. There have been arguments in relation to organising bank finance delays. For those reasons, there is some modest degree of flexibility that state government officers will have if it can come within the criterion of an unforeseen event, but in terms of the context of extending or hardwiring the extension of three months to some longer period, the federal government has said no.</text>
        <text id="202006301d4df7ee853f4738b0000319">It wants to see immediate stimulus to the industry, and it therefore wants this scheme to be time limited to six months maximum, because they believe that is the time period within which the stimulus is required.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>