<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="1143" />
  <endPage num="1186" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Advertising</name>
      <text id="20200630d9cee686cc544dd7b0000151">
        <heading>Government Advertising</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>Government Advertising</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T14:48:30" />
        <text id="20200630d9cee686cc544dd7b0000152">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T14:48:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:48):</by>  A supplementary: what financial number per hit on the website will be seen as a good outcome? Are we talking $10, $20 per hit on a website for a $1.2 million campaign or are we talking less than the postage stamp it would have cost to post them this with their water bills?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-30">
            <name>Government Advertising</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-30T14:48:51" />
        <text id="20200630d9cee686cc544dd7b0000153">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-30T14:48:51" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:48):</by>  I have already indicated that the government will make publicly available the evaluation of the campaign. I have already indicated in general terms how campaigns like this are judged in terms of their effectiveness and I am not sure there is much more that I can add to the responses to the two or three earlier questions of a similar nature that have been put to me.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>