<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="993" />
  <endPage num="1038" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Safeguarding Taskforce Interim Report</name>
      <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000431">
        <heading>Safeguarding Taskforce Interim Report</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-16">
            <name>Safeguarding Taskforce Interim Report</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-16T14:50:20" />
        <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000432">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-16T14:50:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:50):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Human Services a question regarding disability services.</text>
        <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000433">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000434">
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER:</by>  In previous question times the minister has answered questions in relation to the sharing of information about checks for people working with people living with a disability. The minister has said that it is the commonwealth's responsibility for those who are employed but is not sure what information the state gives the commonwealth; but it is a state responsibility for the screening of such workers but is not sure what information the commonwealth gives to the state.</text>
        <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000435">The Safeguarding Taskforce Interim Report of June 2020 in a number of places, but particularly recommendation 8.4 and safeguarding gap 11, suggests that the minister's department, that is, the Department of Human Services, revisits the information sharing guidelines as they impact on the screening of workers. My question to the minister is: what information sharing guidelines are they referring to?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-06-16T14:51:37" />
        <text id="202006169836e57b85cc417eb0000436">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-16T14:51:37" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:51):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. I have to repeat what I have advised previously to the house because it does seem that the Labor Party doesn't actually understand how the NDIS operates on a number of levels. The responsibility for regulating organisations that provide NDIS services rests with the Quality and Safeguards Commission as the federal regulator. Under their rules, providers are required to ensure that all relevant staff have an appropriate screening, which is provided by the Department of Human Services, and that is how the system operates.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>