<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="901" />
  <endPage num="954" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Safeguarding Taskforce</name>
      <text id="2020060396a3cea8351f4386a0000101">
        <heading>Safeguarding Taskforce</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-03">
            <name>Safeguarding Taskforce</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:30:48" />
        <text id="2020060396a3cea8351f4386a0000102">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:30:48" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:30):</by>  Supplementary arising from the original answer given that referred to the terms of reference: who drafted the draft terms of reference? Was it the task force, or was it your office, or was it somewhere else in government?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-03">
            <name>Safeguarding Taskforce</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:31:04" />
        <page num="905" />
        <text id="2020060396a3cea8351f4386a0000103">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:31:04" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:31):</by>  I am really pleased that the Labor opposition is so obsessed with this particular process of how they came into being, because it was the chair—the chair at the time, who then became the co-chair—who drafted the initial terms of reference, and the ones that we will provide publicly this afternoon are not that much different.</text>
        <text id="2020060396a3cea8351f4386a0000104">It has been a strange focus on this particular set of words, which are very broad, and, as I said yesterday, I have taken the view that the task force should have latitude so they may well identify other issues that they think are important. As I talked about yesterday, there is a whole web of issues relating to safeguarding. If the Labor opposition would spend two minutes listening to people in the sector, they would understand that there are a whole range of ways that we can improve safeguarding for people with disabilities, particularly the ones who are the most vulnerable, who might have profound disabilities, who might not be verbal, who might have significant physical limitations and particularly those who don't have someone else to advocate for them.</text>
        <text id="2020060396a3cea8351f4386a0000105">There are layers, and that is why the inclusion agenda is so important, because it is all about human rights for people with disabilities—that they have the same rights and expectations as every other person in our society. Those are things that I have certainly heard. Those are the messages from the speakers at the vigil on Saturday. Those are the messages that I hear loud and clear from correspondents and from concerned South Australians.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>