<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="901" />
  <endPage num="954" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Alcohol Warning Labels</name>
      <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000167">
        <heading>Alcohol Warning Labels</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-03">
            <name>Alcohol Warning Labels</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:45:23" />
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000168">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:45:23" />
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS (14:45):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Health and Wellbeing a question about warning labels on alcohol beverages.</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000169">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000170">
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  Nationally, moves are afoot for the introduction of mandatory pregnancy warning labels on packaged alcohol. The proposal by the country's food regulator, Food Standards Australia New Zealand, is designed to raise awareness of the dangers of drinking during pregnancy and by doing so attempt to stem the number of babies born with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) each year.</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000171">Next month, the health minister and the agriculture minister, Tim Whetstone, will be asked to vote on the proposal for a second time. Disappointingly, the last time they were requested to vote on the proposal, earlier this year, both ministers voted with the industry and self-interest to shoot down the proposal.</text>
        <page num="909" />
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000172">Further, I also understand both ministers wrote to other state ministers, asking them to reject FSANZ's proposal. I am advised that after both ministers voted against the proposal, FSANZ was subsequently asked to revise the costs of such a program to industry and instead propose the use of the colour red and signal words in the warning instead. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000173">1.&amp;#x9;Why did you and minister Whetstone vote against the introduction of mandatory pregnancy warning labels on packaged alcohol?</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000174">2.&amp;#x9;Why did you and minister Whetstone write to other state ministers urging them to reject the proposal?</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000175">3.&amp;#x9;Are you prepared to table those letters that were sent to other ministers?</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000176">4.&amp;#x9;Do you believe it is appropriate for a health minister to put the concerns of the alcohol industry above those of the public health and the health of future unborn children?</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000177">5.&amp;#x9;Will you continue to reject any proposal the alcohol industry doesn't like?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:47:32" />
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000178">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:47:32" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:47):</by>  I suspect I might have trouble tabling the letter, because I don't think I wrote such a letter. The honourable member's statement is littered with assertions that I don't believe are true. For example, my recollection is that I didn't attend the last meeting of the forum. I don't recall having written a letter, but I will certainly check my records.</text>
        <text id="202006030318a35cb0bf4a9090000179">In terms of my understanding of the current state of that issue, ministers had a discussion about the work that had been done by FSANZ. We asked FSANZ to do more work and we are going to consider it at the next ministerial meeting. I don't apologise that South Australia wants to properly consider these issues and make a decision when all of the relevant information is available.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>