<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-06-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="901" />
  <endPage num="954" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Disability Services</name>
      <text id="202006033e77d79849f94ce780000148">
        <heading>Disability Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-03">
            <name>Disability Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:38:46" />
        <text id="202006033e77d79849f94ce780000149">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:38:46" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  Supplementary arising from the answer: can the minister assure the chamber that South Australia is abiding by all its obligations under the Intergovernmental Agreement on Nationally Consistent Worker Screening, particularly in relation to the guidelines in Queensland?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-06-03">
            <name>Disability Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-06-03T14:39:05" />
        <text id="202006033e77d79849f94ce780000150">
          <timeStamp time="2020-06-03T14:39:05" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (14:39):</by>  I'm not sure what the honourable member is referring to in relation to guidelines in Queensland. My understanding is that we do comply with the agreements. I received something quite recently, I think, from the Quality and Safeguards Commission in relation to the next stage of a national disability worker screening system, which was due to go live prior to now.</text>
        <text id="202006033e77d79849f94ce780000151">My understanding is that the screening unit is ready for that system as soon as the other states are available, and that the screening system is now due for February next year. We have, in addition, asked the Quality and Safeguarding Commission to provide us access to their carer concerns because we think that information is important to advise our screening unit of anything that may be on their system, so clearly the more information that is provided to the DHS screening unit the better.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>