<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-04-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="573" />
  <endPage num="621" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
      <text id="20200429e4d3e84656bc4db280000175">
        <heading>Public Sector Employees</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-04-29">
            <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-04-29T15:10:10" />
        <text id="20200429e4d3e84656bc4db280000176">
          <timeStamp time="2020-04-29T15:10:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (15:10):</by>  A supplementary arising from the answer: is the Treasurer aware whether government officials are currently in negotiations that would see non-wage elements, such as rights and entitlements, wound back in industrial agreements for front-line workers?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-04-29">
            <name>Public Sector Employees</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-04-29T15:10:26" />
        <text id="20200429e4d3e84656bc4db280000177">
          <timeStamp time="2020-04-29T15:10:26" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:10):</by>  Every public sector enterprise bargaining arrangement involves the capacity for efficiency offsets. For example, in relation to the Australian Education Union dispute, the AEU agreed to some offsets in relation to what was eventually a 2.35 per cent salary increase for teachers and a 3.35 per cent salary increase for principals and preschool directors.</text>
        <text id="20200429e4d3e84656bc4db280000178">I am not sure how enterprise bargaining was conducted under the former government, but under this government there is a discussion about what is a reasonable salary increase, and if there is to be something that is a little bit above that there are productivity efficiency offsets in terms of what the taxpayers of South Australia would get out of that particular deal. In relation to that my colleague the Labor Treasurer for Victoria, Tim Pallas, has adopted exactly the same position: that is, a reasonable salary increase being offered and, if there were to be something a bit higher than that it had to be offset by efficiency or productivity offsets agreed to by the public sector unions. I think that is also the position of the Liberal government in Tasmania.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>