<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-04-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="573" />
  <endPage num="621" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Donor Conception Register</name>
      <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000109">
        <heading>Donor Conception Register</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-04-29">
            <name>Donor Conception Register</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-04-29T14:45:29" />
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000110">
          <timeStamp time="2020-04-29T14:45:29" />
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS (14:45):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Minister for Health and Wellbeing a question about donor conception registers.</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000111">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5418" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C. BONAROS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000112">
          <by role="member" id="5418">The Hon. C. BONAROS:</by>  Along with thousands of donor-conceived people, I was absolutely delighted last year when the state government agreed to establish a register of sperm, eggs and embryo donors in South Australia. This followed a surprising, but very much welcome, backflip by the government on its original decision to oppose the register, which was the centrepiece of a private member's bill I introduced in October of last year.</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000113">For those of you who may have forgotten—I am sure the Hon. John Dawkins is not amongst them—the government's about-face support of the register came during the debate on the government's planned surrogacy laws, which were successfully passed and will now make surrogacy easier for more people, whereby I introduced amendments to have the register included in that bill. Thank goodness that went well.</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000114">In that complete reversal from the original position, the Attorney-General agreed to the amendments and the legislation was passed in a history-making milestone for thousands of people born with donor assistance in South Australia. Of course, under that legislation, the register needs to be established within two years. My questions to the minister are:</text>
        <page num="580" />
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000115">1.&amp;#x9;Given it has now been five months since the legislation was passed, how is the establishment of the register progressing?</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000116">2.&amp;#x9;Can the minister provide an update on the sort of model that will be adopted for the register?</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000117">3.&amp;#x9;How much, if any, money has been set aside initially for its establishment?</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000118">4.&amp;#x9;If it is known, what will the annual budget be in terms of maintaining that register?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2020-04-29T14:47:22" />
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000119">
          <timeStamp time="2020-04-29T14:47:22" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:47):</by>  I certainly don't accept the characterisation of the honourable member that this government backflipped. This government has an unshakeable commitment to ensuring that people who have been conceived through donor conception have access to their genetic heritage.</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000120">We have only been in power for a little over two years, and yet it has been decades that this issue has not been resolved, almost two decades. I recognise that knowing one's own genetic heritage is a right and is integral to identity, and we are pleased to be moving towards a register.</text>
        <text id="202004296eb4a33f326642db90000121">In terms of the time frame going forward, as the honourable member says, we are five months into a two-year time frame. The government is looking through a range of models. Let's be clear: just because the amendments got through the lower house didn't mean that the problems in the honourable member's model somehow magically disappeared. We have to work through a range of issues, and we will continue to do that in a workmanlike way.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>