<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="337" />
  <endPage num="367" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
      <text id="202003245c75e709302748f790000225">
        <heading>Economic Stimulus Package</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-03-24">
            <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-03-24T15:24:30" />
        <text id="202003245c75e709302748f790000226">
          <timeStamp time="2020-03-24T15:24:30" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (15:24):</by>  Supplementary from the original answer: does the Treasurer have or can he take on notice and bring back a figure of what portion of the $350 million is new money, what portion is brought forward from the forward estimates and what portion was money that had been indicated may be spent outside the forward estimates?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-03-24">
            <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-03-24T15:24:49" />
        <text id="202003245c75e709302748f790000227">
          <timeStamp time="2020-03-24T15:24:49" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:24):</by>  I am happy to take that question on notice. We have openly acknowledged, as I have outlined in this house today, that a significant part of the maintenance-type projects that we talked about in the $350 million was the bringing forward of projects which are in the forward estimates in maybe years three and four of the forward estimates into year one and year two. A number of the other initiatives were obviously examples of new money that the government had committed to. I am happy to get a broad description of those and bring them back to the house.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>