<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="337" />
  <endPage num="367" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
      <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000219">
        <heading>Economic Stimulus Package</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-03-24">
            <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-03-24T15:22:06" />
        <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000220">
          <timeStamp time="2020-03-24T15:22:06" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:22):</by>  My supplementary question is: Treasurer, when you are in discussions with the federal government about bringing forward some of these—I think he used the word 'shovel-ready'—projects, is consideration being given to redirecting some of those government commitments to projects that are more relevant to South Australia during an emergency, such as projects that create more jobs or, as the Treasurer mentioned, projects that might relate to the health system?</text>
        <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000221">To put the question in another way, rather than widening Portrush Road, Cross Road or Fullarton Road—these contentious urban projects—is the minister asking the feds to redirect some of those tens of millions of dollars to other projects that might be more relevant to South Australia during a health emergency?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-03-24">
            <name>Economic Stimulus Package</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-03-24T15:22:58" />
        <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000222">
          <timeStamp time="2020-03-24T15:22:58" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:22):</by>  The simple answer is no. We are actually asking the federal government to put their hands in their back pockets and give us more money for those regional road projects. Both the federal and state governments do believe these projects have merit in terms of built-up areas, but they necessarily take time, for the reasons that I have outlined.</text>
        <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000223">We are not resiling from the importance of the congestion busting intersection projects that have been announced in the last 12 months, but what we are saying in this climate of emergency to the commonwealth government—and they have agreed—is 'Okay, if you are looking for shovel-ready projects and work that can be done much more quickly, then there are important shoulder sealing and, in particular, road sealing works in country areas that fit the bill.'</text>
        <text id="2020032433ec454eb67a4826b0000224">Previously, I have been publicly quoted as saying overtaking lanes, but I have been advised by people more expert than I that there are marginally more complications in getting overtaking lanes done through planning requirements and others. It is much quicker to get road servicing and shoulder sealing done, and so my language has excluded the third in more recent times, based on much better advice. That is the area that we are negotiating. I am not, but minister Knoll is negotiating with his commonwealth colleagues. As I said, we are very hopeful that in the very near future we will get some announcements in relation to regional road projects.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>