<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2020-02-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="137" />
  <endPage num="180" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Emergency Services Workers</name>
      <text id="20200219b15385151daf4f7ab0000170">
        <heading>Emergency Services Workers</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-02-19">
            <name>Emergency Services Workers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-02-19T14:47:29" />
        <text id="20200219b15385151daf4f7ab0000171">
          <timeStamp time="2020-02-19T14:47:29" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:47):</by>  Supplementary: will the Treasurer provide for the council and, indeed, for the benefit of those volunteer associations and their members, the correspondence sent to SAFECOM ruling out this proposal?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2020-02-19">
            <name>Emergency Services Workers</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2020-02-19T14:47:47" />
        <text id="20200219b15385151daf4f7ab0000172">
          <timeStamp time="2020-02-19T14:47:47" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:47):</by>  No. What I will do is that when the decision is finally taken I hope that it will be something which is satisfactory to the volunteers, and I am led to believe that that is likely to be the case. I would hope that a satisfactory resolution to the issue is what the volunteers should be happy with. As I indicated, the decision-making process that occurred, or what occurred in the last few days of December last year, was an exchange of emails between Treasury officers and SAFECOM officers which indicated, 'Here's how we would actually change the communiqué,' and the words to which the honourable member has referred were proposed to be changed in an exchange of emails.</text>
        <text id="20200219b15385151daf4f7ab0000173">Those officers do not have the authority to make decisions. They are, nevertheless, the ones who are doing the work and they refer it to the SAFECOM board and it eventually comes to me as Treasurer. So there are processes to make a decision but in relation to having heard the criticism and making recommended changes to the wording, in particular to the words to which the honourable member has referred, there was an exchange of emails, I am advised, at the end of December.</text>
        <text id="20200219b15385151daf4f7ab0000174">As I said, I am sure, from my discussions with volunteers, all they are going to be interested in is: is there a satisfactory resolution and, for the first time, will this government provide the additional benefits and entitlements that the former Labor government didn't provide? In the end, if that's a satisfactory resolution my experience with volunteers is that they will welcome that warmly; however, the process may well have eventuated over the last few weeks.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>