Legislative Council Fifty-Fourth Parliament, Second Session (54-2) 54 2 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Motions Motions Citizen's Right of Reply Citizen's Right of Reply The Hon. R.I. LUCAS Legislative Council The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:56): I move: That, during the present session, the council make available to any person who believes that he or she has been adversely referred to during proceedings of the Legislative Council the following procedure for seeking to have a response incorporated into Hansard— 1.	Any person who has been referred to in the Legislative Council by name, or in another way so as to be readily identified, may make a submission in writing to the President— (a)	claiming that he or she has been adversely affected in reputation or in respect of dealings or associations with others, or injured in profession, occupation or trade or in the holding of an office, or in respect of any financial credit or other status or that his or her privacy has been unreasonably invaded; and (b)	requesting that his or her response be incorporated into Hansard. 2.	The President shall consider the submission as soon as practicable. 3.	The President shall reject any submission that is not made within a reasonable time. 4.	If the President has not rejected the submission under clause 3, the President shall give notice of the submission to the member who referred in the council to the person who has made the submission. 5.	In considering the submission, the President— (a)	may confer with the person who made the submission; (b)	may confer with any member; (c)	must confer with the member who referred in the council to the person who has made the submission and provide to that member a copy of any proposed response at least one clear sitting day prior to the publication of the response; but (d)	may not take any evidence; (e)	may not judge the truth of any statement made in the council or the submission. 6.	If the President is of the opinion that— (a)	the submission is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or offensive in character; or (b)	the submission is not made in good faith; or (c)	the submission has not been made within a reasonable time; or (d)	the submission misrepresents the statements made by the member; or (e)	there is some other good reason not to grant the request to incorporate a response into Hansard, the President shall refuse the request and inform the person who made it of the President’s decision. 7.	The President shall not be obliged to inform the council or any person of the reasons for any decision made pursuant to this resolution. The President’s decision shall be final and no debate, reflection or vote shall be permitted in relation to the President’s decision. 8.	Unless the President refuses the request on one or more of the grounds set out in paragraph 5 of this resolution, the President shall report to the council that in the President’s opinion the response in terms agreed between him and the person making the request should be incorporated into Hansard and the response shall thereupon be incorporated into Hansard. 9.	A response— (a)	must be succinct and strictly relevant to the question in issue; (b)	must not contain anything offensive in character; (c)	must not contain any matter the publication of which would have the effect of— (i)	unreasonably adversely affecting or injuring a person, or unreasonably invading a person’s privacy in the manner referred to in paragraph 1 of this resolution; or (ii)	unreasonably aggravating any adverse effect, injury or invasion of privacy suffered by any person; or (iii)	unreasonably aggravating any situation or circumstance; and (d)	must not contain any matter the publication of which might prejudice— (i)	the investigation of any alleged criminal offence; (ii)	the fair trial of any current or pending criminal proceedings; or (iii)	any civil proceedings in any court or tribunal. 10.	In this resolution— (a)	'person' includes a corporation of any type and an unincorporated association; (b)	'member' includes a former member of the Legislative Council. In speaking briefly to this motion, I have lost track of the number of years but it has been many years that we have been moving this motion, under Labor and Liberal governments, to allow a citizen's right of reply. These are the quite complex guidelines which apply to anyone seeking a citizen's right of reply—rules of engagement, I suppose. They are unchanged from previous versions of a similar motion and I urge the support of the chamber for this particular motion. Motion carried.