<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-12-05" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5535" />
  <endPage num="5641" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
      <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000425">
        <heading>Women's and Children's Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-12-05">
            <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-12-05T14:42:34" />
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000426">
          <timeStamp time="2019-12-05T14:42:34" />
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN (14:42):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing regarding the Women's and Children's Hospital.</text>
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000427">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5412" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000428">
          <by role="member" id="5412">The Hon. C.M. SCRIVEN:</by>  Today, there was an announcement at the Women's and Children's Hospital about the new Women's and Children's Hospital, about new partnerships, in which it discussed that 'a consortium of Aurecon and Deloitte will work with us to prepare the final business case, find opportunities in the co-location with the new RAH, set up the project management office and a number of other factors'. Is the minister saying that he was unaware of this process or unaware of this consortium, even though it was announced today by his department at the Women's and Children's Hospital?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-12-05T14:43:23" />
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000429">
          <timeStamp time="2019-12-05T14:43:23" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (14:43):</by>  The honourable member does not seem to understand what devolution means. The former Labor government was focused on centralising power in a multistorey building on Hindmarsh Square. They abolished boards. They had a Stalin-like approach to managing the health bureaucracy. We, in contrast, believe that devolution is important. That means that boards working with local management make local decisions.</text>
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000430">As I have indicated earlier, I was aware of the Women's and Children's Hospital project team tender process. I will certainly seek an update following the honourable member's question, but let me be clear to honourable members: I look forward to your questions, I look forward to answering all that I am able to, but let's remember that when we have a portfolio that employs more than 44,000 people—across LHNs, across the ambulance services, across the department—there is a lot that happens in the portfolio that I will need to seek further advice on.</text>
        <text id="20191205d0b2914e3740451380000431">One of my parliamentary colleagues was suggesting to me earlier this week that he thought that SA Health would probably be the largest employer by multitudes, perhaps tenfold. I appreciate there are other honourable members who would have a better idea of what the largest private sector employer would be in South Australia, but I am told that it's likely to be less than 10,000. SA Health is not only a major provider of health services in South Australia, they are also a major employer right across the state. We will continue to devolve, because it makes sense.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>