<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-12-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5297" />
  <endPage num="5405" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Freedom of Information</name>
      <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000246">
        <heading>Freedom of Information</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-12-03">
            <name>Freedom of Information</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-12-03T15:11:38" />
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000247">
          <timeStamp time="2019-12-03T15:11:38" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:11):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking a question of the Minister for Health and Wellbeing about compliance with freedom of information laws.</text>
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000248">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000249">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  Three weeks ago I asked the Minister for Health and Wellbeing why he had not yet complied with a determination of the Ombudsman to release certain documents to me under the Freedom of Information Act. These were documents that related to the subject of genetically modified organisms, which I note has occupied a little of the time of the other place today. The documents the Ombudsman ordered to be released were followed up by my office after the 30-day appeal period had expired. They were followed up again by email and again today, and yet we still have no indication that the minister intends to abide by the law.</text>
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000250">The problem that I have is that I don't have the right to go to SACAT on appeal, because I am not aggrieved at the Ombudsman's decision. The Ombudsman made a most excellent decision. I've got no right to go to court, yet there appears to be no mechanism to force the minister to obey the law.</text>
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000251">My questions again of the minister are: when will you obey the law; when will you comply with the Ombudsman's ruling; and when will you provide these freedom of information documents that you were ordered to provide back in September?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-12-03T15:13:11" />
        <text id="2019120333ce8fef50344e1da0000252">
          <timeStamp time="2019-12-03T15:13:11" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:13):</by>  I have every intention of abiding by the law. In relation to the freedom of information law, there are processes for review not only of a minister's office or department's decision but also in relation to decisions of the Ombudsman. We will continue to consider our options in relation to the freedom of information.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>