<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-11-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5083" />
  <endPage num="5118" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Psychiatric Impairment Assessment Guidelines</name>
      <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000591">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Psychiatric Impairment Assessment Guidelines</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-11-26">
            <name>Psychiatric Impairment Assessment Guidelines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000592">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4363">the Hon. T.A. FRANKS </by>(31 October 2019).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-11-26">
            <name>Psychiatric Impairment Assessment Guidelines</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000593">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer):</by>  I have been provided the following advice:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000594">
          <inserted>Psychiatric impairment in the Return to Work scheme is assessed using the Guide to the Evaluation of Psychiatric Impairment for Clinicians (GEPIC) as published in the Impairment Assessment Guidelines.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000595">
          <inserted>The GEPIC assessment methodology involves the evaluation of six mental functions: thinking, perception, judgement, mood, behaviour and intelligence.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000596">
          <inserted>Intelligence relates to an individual's capacity for understanding and other forms of adaptive behaviour. Impairments of intelligence can be a consequence of brain injury or disease. However, in the majority of work injury assessments there is no impairment of intelligence.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20191126026288f5253a498ca0000597">
          <inserted>In answer to your second question, there have been no assessments in the registered scheme with an assessment rating of between 3 and 5 for the mental function of intelligence.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>