<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4987" />
  <endPage num="5082" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Cruise Ship Strategy</name>
      <text id="20191114f29337a07aa44b89a0000535">
        <heading>Cruise Ship Strategy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-11-14">
            <name>Cruise Ship Strategy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-11-14T15:13:08" />
        <page num="5016" />
        <text id="20191114f29337a07aa44b89a0000536">
          <timeStamp time="2019-11-14T15:13:08" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:13):</by>  I appreciate the minister will be speaking to his former colleague the current mayor. The question is: given that these visitors do not pay rates and they are currently not even paying any passenger ship landing fees, there is no source of revenue for local council to provide these services, so will the government step in and assist if the new infrastructure that is required is specifically required for the increased visitation caused by tourism visitors?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-11-14">
            <name>Cruise Ship Strategy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-11-14T15:13:42" />
        <text id="20191114f29337a07aa44b89a0000537">
          <timeStamp time="2019-11-14T15:13:42" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment) (15:13):</by>  You can arrive as a tourist in a number of ways—by a plane, by a ferry with the current SeaLink service or by cruise ship—so I don't think that to levy just the cruise ship passengers to pay for these services or facilities would be an appropriate way to do it. As I said in my answer a few weeks ago, that is a matter that is of ongoing discussion between the SATC and the local council. I think the tourism commission does spend—I don't have an exact figure—a couple of hundred thousand dollars providing services there.</text>
        <text id="20191114f29337a07aa44b89a0000538">Of course, there was well over $1 million spent by SATC for the tender facilities for the boats to come from the ships—the smaller boats to come into Penneshaw—so there has been a significant amount of investment, and those issues around passenger levies are an ongoing discussion. I'm sure at some point in the future, we will have some more clarity on that issue.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>