<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-11-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4987" />
  <endPage num="5082" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Government Marketing and Communications</name>
      <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000405">
        <heading>Government Marketing and Communications</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-11-14">
            <name>Government Marketing and Communications</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-11-14T14:37:26" />
        <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000406">
          <timeStamp time="2019-11-14T14:37:26" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:37):</by>  My question is to the minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. Ridgway</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000407">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. Ridgway:</by>  Is it supplementary?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000408">
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  It is a supplementary. Can the minister now elaborate for us whether the criteria for the success of a marketing campaign are hits on websites and platforms, rather than actual visitor numbers coming to the state? Does he have any indication if visitor numbers in South Australia have increased since the 'old mate' campaign? Can he perhaps also give us a breakdown of the demographics of that campaign?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-11-14T14:38:04" />
        <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000409">
          <timeStamp time="2019-11-14T14:38:04" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment) (14:38):</by>  I thank the honourable member for his question. As the honourable members all know, our target is $8 billion of visitor spending by 2020. It's a target that was embraced by the former government, and the current government embraces it. The first measure we use on success is visitor expenditure. About a month ago, we announced that it's at $7.6 billion, the biggest it has ever been in the history of this state. In actual fact, I don't have the exact figures with me today, but—as members opposite have interjected—some of the international figures are down a little bit, but the visitor spend is up, and intrastate and interstate visitations are also up.</text>
        <text id="20191114d49f50c14ac0466ca0000410">For the honourable member's benefit, we measure it by actually striving to achieve our goal of $8 billion by 2020 and $12.6 billion by 2030. We are well on the way to achieving that goal. Campaigns like 'old mate', which are a little bit different and a little bit edgy—and I think all members recognise that—give us a chance to actually, if you like, stand out in the crowd a bit and attract attention. The theme of that whole ad was: don't leave it too late; come to South Australia before it's too late. Of course, we saw, during the AFL grand final, that 'old mate' came back with a couple of his old mates, to the tune of <term>The Boys are Back in Town</term>—another great success.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>