<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-10-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4637" />
  <endPage num="4714" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Wine Export Roadshow</name>
      <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000453">
        <heading>Wine Export Roadshow</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-10-17">
            <name>Wine Export Roadshow</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-10-17T14:39:37" />
        <page num="4663" />
        <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000454">
          <timeStamp time="2019-10-17T14:39:37" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:39):</by>  Further supplementary arising from the answer: as a result of the minister's attendance at San Francisco, what specific benefit, how many more contracts, how many more South Australian jobs resulted because of the minister's attendance in San Francisco?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-10-17">
            <name>Wine Export Roadshow</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-10-17T14:39:57" />
        <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000455">
          <timeStamp time="2019-10-17T14:39:57" />
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment) (14:39):</by>  Mr President, this is the sort of question that was asked yesterday. I think—</text>
        <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000456">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1820" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000457">
          <by role="member" id="1820">The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY:</by>  It would be good if the members opposite would listen for a change. This is about supporting our wine producers, and of course we have four of the great Australian families of wine. We have the Osbornes, the Hill-Smiths, the Henschkes and the Angoves, so we have four of the great nation building wine families. Just the fact that you can go there—and that's what members opposite don't understand—to show just an hour or two support—and we only had about an hour or two in my program to go there—to support this sector indicates that this government values the sector. We want them to grow it. It is now worth over $2 billion to us.</text>
        <text id="20191017b7b2869bde0c432a90000458">We want to make sure that we get the market intel, so that when we have appointed somebody in Houston they can actually support some of our vignerons getting especially into the Texas market, which is a particularly strong market, some 30-odd million people, and a particularly strong economy, and we think we will have some wonderful success in Texas. I think it is a bit of a cheap shot and a bit childish to say, 'Well, how many jobs, how many orders?' This is about a government that supports exporters, supports our economy. We want to make sure that people know we are going to be there with them every step of the way.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>