<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-09-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4413" />
  <endPage num="4441" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Sugary Drinks</name>
      <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000250">
        <heading>Sugary Drinks</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-24">
            <name>Sugary Drinks</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-24T15:06:32" />
        <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000251">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-24T15:06:32" />
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL (15:06):</by>  Supplementary.</text>
        <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000252">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000253">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Can we have some order for the Hon. Mr Parnell's supplementary.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3130" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. M.C. PARNELL</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000254">
          <by role="member" id="3130">The Hon. M.C. PARNELL:</by>  When the minister said there was a commitment to no new taxes, did he make a specific commitment as well that there would be no new health levies?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3164" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.G. WADE</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health and Wellbeing</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2019-09-24T15:06:57" />
        <text id="20190924760d5286c8da411280000255">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-24T15:06:57" />
          <by role="member" id="3164">The Hon. S.G. WADE (Minister for Health and Wellbeing) (15:06):</by>  This is a great ploy of the left: redefine every tax with a moral imperative. Let me also make another point, now that the honourable member has given me an opportunity to add dot point 2. Dot point 2 is that I think it would be very unwise for any state to act alone. I appreciate the decision of the federal government. These decisions would have to be made at the national level.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>