<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4267" />
  <endPage num="4315" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="20190910a9fdb88be15441cc90000258">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3125" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T15:09:30" />
        <text id="20190910a9fdb88be15441cc90000259">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T15:09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="3125">The Hon. R.P. WORTLEY (15:09):</by>  Supplementary: is there any part of your land tax policy that's not negotiable?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T15:09:38" />
        <text id="20190910a9fdb88be15441cc90000260">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T15:09:38" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:09):</by>  The government is certainly not prepared to wind back the significant reform of driving down the top land tax rate to 2.4 per cent. We think that's broadly supported by everyone; and 92 per cent of individuals will be better off and 75 per cent of company groups will be better off. We are not prepared to make changes, for example, to the increase in the threshold to $450,000 because 9,300 land tax payers will no longer pay land tax as a result of the reforms. We are also not prepared to countenance a situation that the Labor Party was prepared to and that is to allow to continue a situation where someone can own millions of dollars' worth of property and not pay a single dollar in land tax.</text>
        <text id="20190910a9fdb88be15441cc90000261">So the answer to the question is yes, there are non-negotiable aspects to it. We have had 12 weeks of consultation with stakeholder groups and individuals and a very, very large number of people have expressed an interest in this over 12 weeks. We think the package now is a much improved package in terms of driving comprehensive reform and investment into South Australia. The nature of the consultation will be in relation to the technical detail of the drafting of the bill. Then, ultimately, it will be up to the parliament to decide whether it wishes to support the package or not.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>