<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4267" />
  <endPage num="4315" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="201909100cb4bda41dc64bac80000117">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:39:07" />
        <text id="201909100cb4bda41dc64bac80000118">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:39:07" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:39):</by>  Further supplementary arising from the original answer: if the Treasurer believes he has got it so right, and it is so fair this time, why is it that all of the representative bodies are lining up to continue their attacks?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:39:22" />
        <text id="201909100cb4bda41dc64bac80000119">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:39:22" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:39):</by>  It is up to the representative bodies to indicate their position, but a number of the representative bodies, such as the MBA and Business SA, have welcomed key elements of the package that has been announced. They have indicated that they want to have a look at the detail in relation to aggregation, but a significant number of the people who have contacted both me and individual members of the Liberal parliamentary party room, having looked at the new package, have now said to members and to me, 'We support the new package as a reasonable package.' If the government is going to have aggregation it had to do it on the basis of reducing the top rate so that we were more competitive nationally.</text>
        <text id="201909100cb4bda41dc64bac80000120">At 2.4 per cent we are at the national average of all mainland states. Western Australia is at 2.67; Queensland at 2.75; Victoria at 2.25; and New South Wales at 2. The average is 2.4, and the Marshall Liberal government's reform package is pitching at 2.4 per cent—exactly the same as the national average for all mainland states in Australia.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>