<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-09-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4267" />
  <endPage num="4315" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="20190910f31b682634ee486f90000112">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:37:26" />
        <text id="20190910f31b682634ee486f90000113">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:37:26" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:37):</by>  I have a supplementary arising from the answer given. The original—I think the Treasurer previously referred to them as 'estimates', which he said were the same thing as 'modelling', was for an extra $40 million to be raised as a result disaggregation. According to his latest modelling, just how far out were these estimates?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-09-10">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-09-10T14:37:46" />
        <text id="20190910f31b682634ee486f90000114">
          <timeStamp time="2019-09-10T14:37:46" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:37):</by>  As the press release yesterday indicates, they were significantly underestimated. We have now taken advantage of that by introducing the comprehensive reform. Only through that avenue are we able to reduce the top rate from 3.7 per cent to 2.4 per cent. At 2.4 per cent it is $86 million, at 3.6 per cent it is $118 million. It is through the additional revenue that is generated—</text>
        <text id="20190910f31b682634ee486f90000115">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <page num="4271" />
        <text id="20190910f31b682634ee486f90000116">
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS:</by>  It is the additional revenue generated that we are able to drive down the top rate from 3.7 per cent 2.4 per cent, increase the threshold from $391,000 to $450,000 and introduce aggregation provisions which exist in every other state in Australia. South Australia is the lone outlier. It has been unprepared, because we've had a Labor government for 20 years who had a few mates who wouldn't let them do it, but the Marshall Liberal government has got the ticker for comprehensive reform. We will be on the side of the 92 per cent of individuals and the 75 per cent of company groups that will benefit.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>