<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4095" />
  <endPage num="4156" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Scissor Lifts</name>
      <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000170">
        <heading>Scissor Lifts</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-07-23">
            <name>Scissor Lifts</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-07-23T14:57:55" />
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000171">
          <timeStamp time="2019-07-23T14:57:55" />
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS (14:57):</by>  Supplementary: did the Treasurer pre-empt this discussion meeting of 5 July, that he should have been well aware was to take place, with his previous statements in recent months on this matter in the council, and will he now clarify whether the government's position on the use of spotters and standards on sites using scissor lifts is open, to be announced at a later date, or whether he stands by his previous comments that the government would not consider the Coroner's recommendations?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000172">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  The Hon. Ms Franks, that concerns directly the bill, so I am going to have to probably rule that out of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4363" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. T.A. FRANKS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000173">
          <by role="member" id="4363">The Hon. T.A. FRANKS:</by>  No, it actually pre-empts the discussion meeting that the Treasurer called himself; it has nothing to do with the bill. The government could bring forth a bill and clarify their position, but it is not actually a question about the bill.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The President</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000174">
          <by role="office">The PRESIDENT:</by>  Treasurer, do you have anything to add to that question?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2019-07-23T14:58:57" />
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000175">
          <timeStamp time="2019-07-23T14:58:57" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:58):</by>  Other than it directly relates to the issues in the bill that the Hon. Mr Pangallo is canvassing. I am in your hands, Mr President. My understanding of the standing orders is—and there have been rulings before when we were in opposition—that, if there is a bill before the house, we are not entitled to canvass the issues that are in the bill. The Hon. Ms Franks has been here for a number of years and she would be familiar with those previous rulings, so this is nothing new.</text>
        <text id="2019072304fabbb59f8b4191a0000176">We will have the opportunity to discuss these issues, Mr President, but I am in your hands. The standing orders are the standing orders. There's a bill before the house which canvasses all these particular issues. You ruled earlier that I could answer questions in relation to the meeting, which I have done so. These questions are now canvassing matters which will be canvassed and will have to be determined as part of the response to the Hon. Mr Pangallo's bill.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>