<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-07-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4095" />
  <endPage num="4156" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Land Tax</name>
      <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000062">
        <heading>Land Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4697" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. K.J. MAHER</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-07-23">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-07-23T14:26:38" />
        <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000063">
          <timeStamp time="2019-07-23T14:26:38" />
          <by role="member" id="4697">The Hon. K.J. MAHER (Leader of the Opposition) (14:26):</by>  Supplementary arising from the original answer: will the Treasurer consider exemptions for certain sectors of business, such as businesses like retail centres owned by people like Harry Perks and his business associates who will have to pay much more land tax?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-07-23">
            <name>Land Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-07-23T14:26:58" />
        <page num="4097" />
        <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000064">
          <timeStamp time="2019-07-23T14:26:58" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (14:26):</by>  I am certainly not going to enter into the personal business or tax arrangements of individuals or businesses in a public forum. I will leave that to the honourable Leader of the Opposition if he wants to talk about the tax arrangements of individuals.</text>
        <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000065">In relation to the current Land Tax Act and the proposed changes to the land tax bill, it doesn't make specific arrangements in relation to specific businesses or entities. It certainly exempts certain arrangements. In the Budget Statement I indicated that certain trusts, such as charitable trusts, guardianship trusts, complying superannuation funds and the like, were exempt in the other states and were likely to be exempt under the final drafting of the legislation the government brings down.</text>
        <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000066">Given these questions and the interests, if I could briefly outline: the government, unlike other tax bills, has committed itself to public consultation on the final drafting of the bill, so a draft bill will go out for public consultation prior to introduction into the house. In my experience, in this chamber, that is unprecedented or virtually unprecedented. Most tax bills are introduced by governments of either persuasion into the house and then the debate begins. This government is committed, in relation to this particular proposed reform package, to put it out for public consultation. The Premier and I have both committed to listening, consulting and discussing the final shape of the government's proposal.</text>
        <text id="201907237c02086c03784f5da0000067">What will drive the government, however, will be that we are intent, from our land tax reform package, to actually collect less land tax than before. So the increase in the threshold, the reduction of the rate and the pace of the reduction of the rate will reduce our land tax by greater than whatever is to be collected from the new aggregation procedures. We have made that commitment and, in terms of the ongoing consultation and negotiation, the Premier and I, on behalf of the government, are committed to maintaining that particular commitment that, from our land tax reform package, we will collect less land tax than under the old arrangements.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>