<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-06-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3753" />
  <endPage num="3848" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</name>
      <text id="2019061900ccf475def446e280000310">
        <heading>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-06-19">
            <name>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-06-19T15:03:55" />
        <text id="2019061900ccf475def446e280000311">
          <timeStamp time="2019-06-19T15:03:55" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (15:03):</by>  What will happen to those who cannot afford the $50 gap? Will it make their system non-functional? Will they still be able to use it or not? Could they basically be cut off?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="2742" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Human Services</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-06-19">
            <name>Personal Alert Systems Rebate Scheme</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-06-19T15:04:08" />
        <text id="2019061900ccf475def446e280000312">
          <timeStamp time="2019-06-19T15:04:08" />
          <by role="member" id="2742">The Hon. J.M.A. LENSINK (Minister for Human Services) (15:04):</by>  That is something that they would need to speak to their supplier about. My understanding is that this scheme has provided an up-front payment of a $380 subsidy and the ongoing monitoring fees, and has not been reviewed in a long time. If you look at the website you will see that for a number of the providers, magically, their systems cost a very similar amount up front and the monitoring fee is close to that $250 mark.</text>
        <text id="2019061900ccf475def446e280000313">As I said in my original answer, we have certainly been advised that one of the services has already reduced their monitoring fee. There are also a whole range of other similar services which don't rely on this particular technology. So we think that the lack of reviewing of the scheme means that there's probably some much better services that are available that people are already accessing through My Aged Care, or that they may have also signed up to personally, and that potentially for this scheme, while it is incredibly useful for people, there are improvements that can be made.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>