Legislative Council Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1) 54 1 Parliament of South Australia Legislative Council published Answers to Questions Adelaide Football Club Adelaide Football Club The Hon. F. PANGALLO Legislative Council Adelaide Football Club In reply to the Hon. F. PANGALLO (28 February 2019). The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY Legislative Council Minister for Trade Adelaide Football Club The Hon. D.W. RIDGWAY (Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment): The Minister for Transport, Infrastructure and Local Government has provided the following advice: 1.	There have been no applications lodged, or preliminary discussions with the State Commission Assessment Panel (SCAP) in regard to redeveloping the site. It is suggested that contact be made with the Adelaide Parklands Authority and City of Adelaide. 2.	Any new redevelopment would require approval under the Development Act 1993. An application would be assessed against the Adelaide (City) Development Plan and require the approval of the City of Adelaide as relevant planning authority, except in the following circumstances where SCAP is the relevant authority: Any development, that exceeds $5 million when all stages of the development are completed, that has been 'called-in' by the State Coordinator-General. Any development that exceeds $10 million when all stages of the development are completed. Development undertaken by a state agency (other than in partnership or joint venture with a person or body that is not a state agency). Development undertaken by a state agency for the purposes of public infrastructure (whether or not in partnership or joint venture with a person or body that is not a state agency). Development undertaken by a person where the development is initiated or supported by a state agency for the purposes of the provision of public infrastructure and specifically endorsed by the state agency for the purposes of this clause. Development undertaken by a prescribed person for the provision of electricity infrastructure. 3.	Department for Planning, Transport and Infrastructure (DPTI) is not the owner of the site. It is suggested that information be sought from the City of Adelaide as landowner. 4.	DPTI has not been requested by government to assess such a proposal. It is suggested that information be sought from the Adelaide Parklands Authority and City of Adelaide (as site owner). In response to questions 5, 6 and 7 the minister advised that DPTI is not the owner of the land. It is suggested that information is sought from the City of Adelaide as the relevant authority with respect to lease arrangements. 8.	No approaches have been made to DPTI.