<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>Legislative Council</name>
  <date date="2019-04-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Fourth Parliament, First Session (54-1)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>54</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>1</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>Legislative Council</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3093" />
  <endPage num="3145" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Adelaide Football Club</name>
      <page num="3104" />
      <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000223">
        <heading>Adelaide Football Club</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <questions>
          <question date="2019-04-03">
            <name>Adelaide Football Club</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2019-04-03T14:57:45" />
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000224">
          <timeStamp time="2019-04-03T14:57:45" />
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO (14:57):</by>  I seek leave to make a brief explanation before asking the Treasurer a question regarding the Adelaide Aquatic Centre and the Adelaide Football Club.</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000225">Leave granted.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="5419" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. F. PANGALLO</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000226">
          <by role="member" id="5419">The Hon. F. PANGALLO:</by>  On 28 February, I revealed that discussions were well advanced for the club to take over the dilapidated Adelaide Aquatic Centre at North Adelaide and build new headquarters and training facilities. This was met with denials by club hierarchy and brushed aside by the council. It now seems those informal approaches were far more developed and have been going on for months.</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000227">At the weekend, it was announced that the federal government would, in last night's budget, contribute $15 million to the move, the same amount it would cost to replace the centre. This week, the Adelaide city council, which has been quite precious about the hotel development at the Adelaide Oval, announced that the Crows had already made an unsolicited bid for the area of Parklands in North Adelaide known as Park 2 and that it has recommended they can proceed to stage 2 of the council's unsolicited proposals process.</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000228">The possible outcomes are that all or part of the proposal proceeds to stage 3 on an exclusive consideration basis, that the proposal should not continue to be considered on an exclusive basis but that it warrants a competitive bidding process or that the proposal is not suitable for further consideration. Given that the Lord Mayor has in the last few days been spruiking the project, along with a committed handout, the latter seems an unlikely outcome. My questions to the Treasurer are:</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000229">1.&amp;#x9;Considering the estimated cost of the project is around $61 million, is the state government going to follow the federal government and provide funding for the Crows? If so, what amount?</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000230">2.&amp;#x9;Has the Adelaide Football Club approached the government about securing a loan through the South Australian Government Financing Authority for the project?</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000231">3.&amp;#x9;As a project of this type would involve significant change of use to the Parklands, do the Treasurer and the government believe the proposal requires consultation with residents and businesses to gauge broad community support before it proceeds?</text>
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000232">4.&amp;#x9;Considering the Adelaide Aquatic Centre attracts 750,000 unique visits each year, how does the government propose to provide a swim centre accessible to the public in the city?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="605" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. R.I. LUCAS</name>
        <house>Legislative Council</house>
        <startTime time="2019-04-03T15:00:27" />
        <text id="20190403c6849233dc9d4cbab0000233">
          <timeStamp time="2019-04-03T15:00:27" />
          <by role="member" id="605">The Hon. R.I. LUCAS (Treasurer) (15:00):</by>  I thank the honourable member for the question. No proposition for funding has come to me as the Treasurer of the state. My views in relation to these general issues—in the absence of any specific proposal, we are speaking about a hypothetical. I accept the member has put a hypothetical question to me. My general attitude to these sorts of questions is I would take a power of convincing that we should be providing a grant equal to the commonwealth grant, evidently of $15 million. But there has been no proposition put to me as Treasurer.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>